During a break from her role as a college professor,Mikita Brottman took on a unique volunteer opportunity – leading a book club for patients at the Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, a state-run maximum-security forensic psychiatric facility in Maryland. Among the individuals she encountered was Brian Bechtold, who had been committed to the hospital indefinitely after being deemed not criminally responsible for fatally shooting his parents due to paranoid schizophrenia.
Immersed in the book club, Brottman was struck by Bechtold's intelligence and eloquence, prompting her to question why he remained in the hospital after 27 years. In her book, "Couple Found Slain: After a Family Murder," Brottman provides an insider's perspective on the inner workings of the country's forensic psychiatric wards. Drawing from interviews with Bechtold, his medical records, and legal documents, she sheds light on the complexities of the case and the enduring challenges faced by patients like Bechtold.
In her interview, Brottman delves into the harsh daily realities experienced by individuals in forensic psychiatric hospitals, emphasizing the uncertainty surrounding their release as one of the most challenging aspects. Through her exploration, she opens a window into the often overlooked world of forensic psychiatry, offering a thought-provoking reflection on the boundaries between justice, mental health, and the lingering questions surrounding the potential for rehabilitation and release.
How And Why Do People End Up In Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals?
All the individuals residing in the psychiatric facility have a commonality – they have committed offenses, yet they do not fit the traditional definition of criminals. Instead, they have been adjudicated as not responsible for their actions. This diverse population includes those who stand accused of serious felonies, awaiting competency evaluations to determine their trial readiness. Additionally, some are transferred from other state psychiatric facilities due to their violent or aggressive behavior, meeting the criteria for involuntary commitment.
However, the majority of residents find themselves in this unique setting because they have been deemed incompetent to stand trial or have been convicted of crimes committed under the influence of mental illness, mirroring the circumstances surrounding Brian's case.
This facility serves as a complex intersection between the legal and mental health systems, housing individuals whose actions are intrinsically linked to their mental health struggles. The reasons for their presence vary, but they share a common thread of grappling with mental health challenges that have profoundly influenced their legal trajectories.
Can They Ever Get Out?
Individuals are sent to the psychiatric facility with the expectation that they will remain until they have sufficiently recovered or reached a level of stability that allows for a gradual reintegration into the community, regardless of the time this process might entail. However, for a portion of these individuals, the prospect of rehabilitation and community reentry remains elusive, and they find themselves confined within the hospital until their passing.
Interestingly, there is a notable absence of a federal agency tasked with monitoring these individuals, and there exists no centralized registry or organization dedicated to tracking the duration of their incarceration or the specific reasons for their prolonged stay.
This lack of oversight raises questions about the accountability and transparency surrounding the extended confinement of individuals within the forensic psychiatric system. The absence of a comprehensive monitoring mechanism adds a layer of complexity to the understanding of the circumstances and outcomes for those navigating the delicate intersection of mental health and the legal system.
What’s A Typical Day Like For Brian And Other Patients In These Facilities?
Typically, patients adhere to a structured routine, commencing their day early with breakfast, followed by periods of waiting. Although the culinary offerings surpass those of a prison, a noteworthy distinction is the absence of silverware, necessitating the use of spoons for all meals.
The day unfolds with an array of groups, encompassing therapeutic sessions and practical daily functions. Some are facilitated by volunteers, introducing diverse activities such as yoga, book clubs, and debate groups. In the interludes, patients are required to remain on the ward, engaging with others in shared spaces, as they cannot retreat to their individual rooms.
During these intervals, individuals often find themselves watching TV or playing cards. Outdoor access is granted within a limited courtyard, allowing for activities like basketball. Many patients participate in facility jobs, with roles ranging from medical assistants to janitors or gardeners.
Remarkably, compensation is provided for their labor. Regular psychiatric sessions, usually occurring weekly, form a crucial component of their care. COVID-19 protocols have shifted in-person visits to virtual interactions via Skype, yet patients can still receive visitors and parcels multiple times a week.
These parcels may include food, books, and other items, offering a degree of comfort distinct from the constraints of prison life. Despite these activities, the daily experience within the facility is characterized by monotony, punctuated by substantial downtime and a lack of specific engagements.
What Has Life Been Like For Brian In The Hospital?
Initially, Brian actively sought help and actively participated in numerous therapy groups, demonstrating commendable progress. However, tensions arose when psychiatrists recommended medication, leading to conflicts with Brian who, over time, felt a restoration of his sanity, contrary to their assessments.
The prescribed medication, unfortunately, brought about distressing side effects such as impotence and incontinence, fostering a growing belief within him that liberation from the psychiatric facility was an unattainable prospect.
Brian's struggles escalated to alarming incidents, including a hostage situation that resulted in a confrontation with the police, leading to his injury from gunfire. On another occasion, he assaulted a social worker. Within the facility, he witnessed three instances of patient-on-patient homicides, adding a layer of trauma to his already turbulent experiences.
Notably, he had a doctor who was declared criminally insane, faced a cancer diagnosis, and successfully recovered. Brian, displaying a resilience reflective of his tumultuous journey, took on the role of representing himself in court twice, passionately arguing for his release.
As time passed, Brian found himself enduring an extended stay, surpassing the duration of almost every other resident, including many of the medical professionals. His life story unfolds as a captivating narrative, marked by extraordinary and traumatic events that have shaped his unique and challenging existence within the confines of the psychiatric facility.
How Are Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals Similar To Or Different From Prisons?
In principle, psychiatric facilities differ significantly from prisons, adopting a more rehabilitative approach. Many of these institutions are co-ed, and individuals are referred to as patients rather than inmates, reflecting a focus on treatment rather than punishment.
Notably, patients retain their personal identities without being assigned numbers, can dress in ordinary clothes, and receive therapy and medical treatment from healthcare professionals. While medication may be administered, sometimes involuntarily, the overarching goal is to provide treatment rather than penalization.
The facilities offer more amenities, improved food quality, and the opportunity for patients to have meaningful visits with friends and family, including physical contact such as hugs. Gradual reintegration into the community is the typical pathway for release, spanning a period of about a year.
However, similarities with prisons persist, evident in the presence of fences, patrolling guards, and the use of punitive measures, including solitary confinement. A crucial distinction lies in the absence of fixed sentences; patients remain in these facilities until deemed well by the medical professionals overseeing their care. Interestingly, some patients, including Brian, have sought transfer to prisons, with those who succeeded attesting to a more dignified treatment within the prison system.
The notable distinction in prison lies in the perception of individuals as ordinary people rather than constantly being under scrutiny as patients. In prison, one can make personal choices, such as staying in their room or abstaining from meals, without these actions being pathologized.
The absence of predetermined release dates in psychiatric facilities has been a significant source of challenge for individuals like Brian. The constant uncertainty and the lack of a tangible progress marker toward a specific goal have contributed to the emotional strain, contrasting with the more structured and defined nature of prison sentences.
How Often Are People Ruled Not Criminally Responsible Because Of A Mental Illness And Sent To Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals In The U.S?
Despite common misconceptions, the 'insanity' defense is infrequently employed and certainly not a straightforward means of evading prison sentences. Findings from an extensive eight-state study reveal that this defense is utilized in less than 1 percent of all court cases. Moreover, when employed, it achieves success in only 26 percent of instances. Remarkably, the majority of successful cases involve defendants who had previously received diagnoses of mental illness, totaling 90 percent of the triumphant cases.
The United States boasts approximately 250 state psychiatric hospitals, with the majority of states hosting two or three such facilities. This expansive network underscores the significant role these institutions play in the intersection of the legal and mental health systems.
The statistics surrounding the 'insanity' defense challenge prevailing assumptions, emphasizing its limited application and success rate in the broader landscape of the American legal system.
What Are The Biggest Misconceptions You Hear About Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals And Their Patients?
Contrary to prevalent stereotypes, the perception of psychiatric facilities often revolves around the misconception that they house individuals who are both crazy and dangerous. In reality, many patients within these institutions are not only intelligent but also articulate individuals with the same fundamental needs, desires, and fears as anyone else.
Unfortunately, the shroud of secrecy enveloping these facilities contributes to a divisive 'us versus them' mentality, fostering stigma and oversimplification of the nuanced realities within.
This prevailing narrative tends to oversimplify the complex dynamics at play, portraying individuals in psychiatric care as inherently evil or dangerous. In truth, the distinction between perpetrators and victims is not as clear-cut as commonly assumed. A deeper understanding reveals that those who commit offenses can, in turn, be victims themselves, unraveling the intricacies of their experiences and backgrounds.
The reality of crime and mental health is far more intricate than the stark dichotomies often presented. Numerous grey areas exist, challenging the conventional narratives surrounding criminal behavior and mental health struggles. Acknowledging the complexity of these issues allows for a more empathetic and nuanced perspective, moving beyond simplistic portrayals that perpetuate stigmas and hinder a comprehensive understanding of the individuals within psychiatric facilities.
In Your Research, Did You Come Across Evidence Of Abuse In These Facilities?
Within psychiatric hospitals, instances of abuse manifest in various forms, ranging from overt acts to more subtle, insidious behaviors that may not fit conventional definitions of abuse. The book includes statistics highlighting cases where guards faced termination for mistreating patients, shedding light on the prevalence of abuse in these settings.
One noteworthy facet is the strain on psychiatrists, who, due to heavy workloads and sizable caseloads, may succumb to fatigue and frustration, inadvertently leading to a loss of empathy. This form of abuse, while less conspicuous than overt violence, can be insidious, eroding the therapeutic relationship and hindering the overall well-being of patients.
Complicating matters is the awareness staff has regarding the often high-profile and egregious actions committed by patients. As part of the treatment regimen, patients are expected to conform to societal norms, and any deviation from expected behavior may be condemned and, at times, met with punishment. The use of restraints and medications, framed as treatment rather than punishment, blurs the line between the two, raising questions about the efficacy and ethical implications of such practices.
Moreover, the atmosphere within psychiatric facilities is not immune to violence. Instances of patient-on-patient aggression and, at times, staff members resorting to violence against patients contribute to the complex and challenging dynamics within these institutions. The book delves into the multifaceted nature of abuse in psychiatric hospitals, exploring the spectrum of actions that compromise the well-being of both patients and staff.
The Type Of Crime That Brian Committed A Child Killing His Parents Has Been Called A ‘schizophrenic Crime.’ What Are The Typical Characteristics Of This Crime?
Extensive research conducted by psychiatrists has shed light on cases involving children who commit matricide or patricide, typically occurring in scenarios akin to Brian's. In these instances, parents, typically in their mid-50s, have subjected their children to prolonged periods of abuse.
The families involved often belong to the predominantly white, middle-class demographic, creating an environment akin to a hothouse where mental illness permeates both the child and the parents.
The interplay of mental health issues within these families becomes a critical factor, forming a volatile combination that acts as a breeding ground for violence. The presence of mental illness amplifies the risk of such crimes, raising the question of whether the same outcome would have occurred in a different familial setting. These acts of violence are typically unpremeditated, catching parents off guard as they engage in mundane activities like cooking dinner.
What makes these cases particularly chilling is the element of surprise they carry for those outside the family unit. Often, these families maintain a facade of normalcy, isolating themselves from the community, which perceives them as an ideal and seemingly flawless unit.
The stark contrast between the public image and the hidden horrors within these households contributes to the profound sense of shock and horror surrounding these incidents. The research provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics that fuel such tragedies, emphasizing the critical role of mental health, family environments, and societal perceptions in understanding the underlying factors contributing to these heinous crimes.
See Also: